Verifiable specification comparison · Daheng Imaging

Daheng Imaging MARS-5000-24GTM-NF alternative from Hikrobot

Hikrobot replacement options for the Daheng Imaging MARS-5000-24GTM-NF: the closest models, what differs (resolution, frame rate, interface, sensor) and what to check before switching.

Comparison with Hikrobot models

No confirmed drop-in replacement. The closest Hikrobot models differ in frame rate, mount and sensor. Each difference is listed below.

To confirm a model for your line, send: current lens, working distance, field of view, object speed, cable length and software.

Continue the search
MV-CH500-90TM-F-NF V2.0
Trade-off — needs agreement
The search threshold is met, but this is not a replacement without trade-offs.
Trade-offs to settle before you choose:
  • Frame rate: 23.3 instead of 24.7 fps (-5.67 %).
  • The lens mount differs: check the fit and the flange distance of your current lens.
The sensor part number is not confirmed in this comparison: we compare by resolution, pixel size, frame or line rate and interface.
Why it is not a drop-in replacement
The table scrolls to the right →
ParameterMARS-5000-24GTM-NFMV-CH500-90TM-F-NF V2.0What it changes
Frame rate24.7 fps23.3 fpsFrame rate: 23.3 instead of 24.7 fps (-5.67 %).
Lens mountF, M58FThe lens mount differs: check the fit and the flange distance of your current lens.
SensorGpixel GMAX3249not publishedConfirm from the datasheet
Specification comparison
The table scrolls to the right →
SpecificationCompetitorOur modelDifference
Resolution 7008 × 7000 px 7008 × 7000 px Matches
Pixel size 3.2 × 3.2 µm 3.2 × 3.2 µm Matches
Sensor Gpixel GMAX3249 Not specified Confirm from the datasheet
Shutter type Global Global Matches
Mono/color Monochrome Monochrome Matches
Spectral range Visible range Visible range Matches
Frame rate 24.7 fps 23.3 fps Trade-off
Interface 10GigE · 10 Gbit/s · RJ45 10GigE · 10 Gbit/s · RJ45 Matches
Lens mount F, M58 F Trade-off
Check the optics Add to selection Continue the search
MV-CH500-90TM-M58S-NF V2.0
Trade-off — needs agreement
The search threshold is met, but this is not a replacement without trade-offs.
Trade-offs to settle before you choose:
  • Frame rate: 23.3 instead of 24.7 fps (-5.67 %).
  • The lens mount differs: check the fit and the flange distance of your current lens.
The sensor part number is not confirmed in this comparison: we compare by resolution, pixel size, frame or line rate and interface.
Why it is not a drop-in replacement
The table scrolls to the right →
ParameterMARS-5000-24GTM-NFMV-CH500-90TM-M58S-NF V2.0What it changes
Frame rate24.7 fps23.3 fpsFrame rate: 23.3 instead of 24.7 fps (-5.67 %).
Lens mountF, M58M58 · 58 mm · 0.75 mm pitchThe lens mount differs: check the fit and the flange distance of your current lens.
SensorGpixel GMAX3249not publishedConfirm from the datasheet
Specification comparison
The table scrolls to the right →
SpecificationCompetitorOur modelDifference
Resolution 7008 × 7000 px 7008 × 7000 px Matches
Pixel size 3.2 × 3.2 µm 3.2 × 3.2 µm Matches
Sensor Gpixel GMAX3249 Not specified Confirm from the datasheet
Shutter type Global Global Matches
Mono/color Monochrome Monochrome Matches
Spectral range Visible range Visible range Matches
Frame rate 24.7 fps 23.3 fps Trade-off
Interface 10GigE · 10 Gbit/s · RJ45 10GigE · 10 Gbit/s · RJ45 Matches
Lens mount F, M58 M58 · 58 mm · 0.75 mm pitch Trade-off
Check the optics Add to selection Continue the search
Other Daheng Imaging models with replacement options
MARS-5000-24GTM-NF specifications
The table scrolls to the right →
SpecificationCompetitor value
Resolution 7008 × 7000 px
Pixel size 3.2 × 3.2 µm
Sensor Gpixel GMAX3249
Shutter type Global
Mono/color Monochrome
Spectral range Visible range
Frame rate 24.7 fps
Interface 10GigE · 10 Gbit/s · RJ45
Lens mount F, M58
Specification sources
Manually checked: 2026-09-08
The spectral range is taken as visible: the manufacturer lists no variant of this model outside the visible range.


Scope of the comparison. The comparison covers only the specifications listed, taken from published sources. It is not a statement of compatibility or interchangeability. Third-party names and trademarks are used solely to identify the products being compared; the rights to them belong to their respective owners. Software, SDK, connectors, mount and dimensions require a separate engineering check.